Publications

Peer reviewed journal articles

1. Klausch, T., Schouten, B., Buelens, B., & van den Brakel, J. (2017). Adjusting measurement bias in sequential mixed-mode surveys using re-interview data. Journal of Survey Statistics and Methodology. https://doi.org/10.1093/jssam/smx022
2. Klausch, T., Schouten, B., & Hox, J. J. (2017). Evaluating Bias of Sequential Mixed-mode Designs Against Benchmark Surveys. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(3), 456–489. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115585362
3. Klausch, T., Hox, J., & Schouten, B. (2015). Selection Error in Single- and Mixed-Mode Surveys of the Dutch General Population. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A (Statistics in Society), 178(4), 945-961. doi: 10.1111/rssa.12102
4. Klausch, T., Hox, J., & Schouten, B. (2013). Measurement Effects of Survey Mode on the Equivalence of Attitudinal Rating Scale Questions. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(3), 227-263. doi: 10.1177/0049124113500480
5. Schouten, B., van den Brakel, J., Buelens, B., van der Laan, J., Burger, J., & Klausch, T. (2013). Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys. Social Science Research, 42(6), 1555-1570. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2013.07.005

---

Professional journals and professional publications

1. Klausch, T. (March 2016). A look into the challenges of mixed-mode surveys. Nieuw Archief voor Wiskunde, 17(1), 49-52.

---

Books and articles in edited books

1. Klausch, T. & Schouten, B. (2016). Mixed-mode Surveys. Willey StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. DOI: 10.1002/9781118445112
2. Klausch, T. (2014). Informed Design of Mixed-Mode Surveys: Evaluating Mode Effects on Measurement and Selection Error. Unpublished PhD thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht.
3. Roberts, A., de Leeuw E., Hox, J., Klausch, T., de Jongh, A. (2013). Leuker kunnen wij het wel maken. Online vragenlijst design: standaard matrix of scrollmatrix (We can actually make it nicer. Online questionnaire design: standard matrix or scrollmatrix). In MOA (ed.), Jaarboek MarktOnderzoekAssociatie 2013(pp. 133-148). Amsterdam: MOA.
4. Roberts, A., de Leeuw, E., Hox, J., Klausch, T., & de Jongh, A. (2013). Pret met panels (Fun with panels). In MOA (ed.), Insights in Marketing Intelligence: Highlights en trends uit het MOA Jaarboek 2013 (pp. 44-46). Amsterdam: MOA.

---

Discussion papers

1. Klausch, T., Schouten, B., Buelens, b, and van den Brakel, J. (2015). Adjusting Measurement Bias in Sequential Mixed-Mode Surveys using Re-interview Data (Discussion Paper No. 2015-23). The, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.
2. Klausch, T., Schouten, B., & Hox, J. (2014). The Use of Within-Subject Experiments for Estimating Measurement Effects in Mixed-Mode Surveys (Discussion Paper No. 2014-06). The Hague, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.
3. Klausch, T., Hox, J. , & Schouten, B. (2013). Assessing the mode-dependency of sample selectivity across the survey response process (Discussion Paper No. 2013-03). The Hague, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands.
4. Buelens, B., van der Laan, J., Schouten, B., van den Brakel, J., & Klausch, T. (2012). Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys (Discussion paper No. 201211). The Hague, The Netherlands: Statistics Netherlands

Advertisements